Baldur’s Gate 3has tons going for it, and it wouldn’t be an exaggeration to say it’s, on balance (and arguably), the most complete videogame RPG experience of all time. But as someone who’s predominantly been playing it in multiplayer (and not without issues), there’s one thing that’s been bothering me, and it’s the complete and total lack of interactivity between the player-controlled characters.
It’s a bit like the player-characters are existing in overlapping dimensions, existing in each other’s worlds but only in this strange spectral way where they run around in the same space, fight together, even pickpocket each other and be a nuisance, but not actually meaningfullyinteract: no talking, no banter, and of course, no sex.
What adds to this disjointed feeling is that if, say, you have two players controlling two characters each, one player can’t talk to the other one’s chosen companion, like they’re their pet sex monkey who’s kept on a leash and been forbidden to speak to anyone lest they run off and become someoneelse’spet sex monkey. In addition, companions and NPCs don’t take into account when they’ve already spoken to another player, and will go through the exact same lines again with you when you speak to them.
RELATED:The Non-Binary Experience In Baldur’s Gate 3 Totally Rocks
Divinity: Original Sin 2was much the same, and for a more interesting solution to player-on-player interactions, you’d actually have to go back to theoriginalDivinity: Original Sinback in 2014. In that game, players control a pair of Source Hunters, whose fates are inextricably tied to each other. At plenty of points in the game, after reading a book or triggering a key event, exclamation marks would pop up above both players’ heads to indicate that you can have an in-game chat with your fellow player.
Now, obviously you can chat in real-life, but there’s something satisfying and character-building about in-game player-to-player interactions. Most of the time, we interact with our real-life friends asfriends, whereas using the in-game dialogues has a bit more of a D&D roleplay feel about it; you’re interacting strictly within the parameters of the narrative, and that’s nice! Depending on the stance you’d take in these chats, your characters would start building up various traits, like Compassionate vs Heartless, Altruistic vs Egotistical, or Pragmatic vs Romantic, which would affect their stats and grant them various bonuses.
NPCs would not only factor in the fact that they already had chats with your partner if you go to talk to them after, but in the middle of another player’s chat, you could actually butt in if you disagreed with what they were about to say. So what happens if you pick one dialogue option and your friend (slash soon-to-be-enemy?) another? Why,rock paper scissors, of course!
Yep, if you were at conversational loggerheads with your buddy in Divinity: Original Sin, then you’d jump into a kind of tug of war, where you start in the middle and play rock paper scissors, which will fill the bar either towards you or the other player. How much bar fills up when you win a round depends on your Persuasion ability, so it’s still very much tied into conversational stats. And it was kind of thrilling, with rock paper scissors being a bit likeBaldur’s Gate 3 dice-rolling, but with a bit of actual skill involved (oh, you think rock paper scissors is just blind luck? Then come find me, I’ll show you how usrealrock-paper-scissorers roll).
RELATED:Would You Really Want Dragon Age To Be Like Baldur’s Gate 3?
I’m not saying that Baldur’s Gate 3 should’ve implemented the exact same system, but it’s just an example of how player-on-player interactions could work in a game like this, seeing as, well Divinity: Original Sin is basically Baldur’s Gate 3’s grandpa. As things stand, my Drow Warlock has zero interaction with my partner’s Wood Elf Rogue In Baldur’s, which just feels like a glaring blind spot in the roleplaying and narrative experience.
I mean, these two would have stuff to say to each other, don’tcha think? In fact, I can’t even go and flirt with whichever secondary companion she’s controlling until we jump through the hoop of going to the menu and switching their control over to the other player. It’s just a bit of a faff.
I can see the importance of some of this stuff for online multiplayer. If you’re playing from different places, then it’s understandable that every player would want to access equal amounts of the story, so inevitably conversations will get repeated (the problem in split-screen is that youseethese chats getting repeated, but little to be done there).
But also wouldn’t it be cool if there weresomeinteractions between you and a given NPC or companion that other players weren’t privy to? Or if you could abuse Persuasion checks to make a companion a bit less fond of your fellow player, soyoucan sleep with them instead; obviously, more broadly, it’d be interesting if you could do even more devious things like backstabbings and betrayals, but in Baldur’s Gate 3 pretty muchall relationships funnel you towards the end-goal of sex, so that’s just what we’ve got to work with.
It may seem like nitpicking to criticise what’s probably the best co-op RPG experience ever created, but when that very same studio has already dabbled in systems that could’ve improved this experience, then it feels like it’s worth highlighting. In most ways, the Baldur’s Gate 3 has come a long way since Divinity: Original Sin, but in this one important way the original still remains king.
Baldur’s Gate 3
WHERE TO PLAY
23 years on from the release of the seminal RPG, Baldur’s Gate 2, the third game in the series has been developed by Larian Studios (of Divinity: Original Sin fame). Set over 120 years after the events of the last game, Baldur’s Gate 3 tasks you and your party of heroes to fight off a mind flayer invasion of Faerun, while seeking a way to remove the tadpole in your brain that’s slowly turning you into the enemy…
